Exposing Ancient Athens: Unveiling the Marginalized Non-Citizens

Welcome to “Exposing Ancient Athens: Unveiling the Marginalized Non-Citizens.” In this article, we delve into the intriguing depths of ancient Athens to uncover the individuals who were denied citizenship in this great civilization. With my expertise as an accomplished historian specializing in ancient civilizations, join me as we unravel the secrets surrounding who exactly was excluded from the rights and privileges of Athenian citizenship. Prepare to embark on a journey through the annals of time, as we shine a light on the marginalized groups that played a significant but often overlooked role in the tapestry of ancient Athenian society.

Who was not considered a citizen in ancient Athens

In order to fully grasp the complexities of ancient Athenian society, it is imperative to examine the individuals who were excluded from citizenship. While Athens is widely known as the birthplace of democracy and celebrated for its advancements in philosophy, arts, and politics, it is worth acknowledging that not everyone had the privilege of being a citizen. Athenian citizenship was a hallmark of social standing and political participation, and as such, it was highly exclusive.

So, who exactly was considered a citizen in ancient Athens? Citizenship was limited to adult males who were born to Athenian parents. This exclusivity meant that foreigners, women, children of non-Athenian parents, and slaves were automatically denied the rights and benefits that came with citizenship. In essence, citizenship in ancient Athens was a deeply ingrained element of identity, reserved only for those born into the right circumstances.

Foreigners, or “metics,” occupied a unique position in Athenian society. While they were not considered citizens, they were allowed to live and work in Athens. Many metics were skilled craftsmen or merchants, contributing to the economic prosperity of the city-state. However, despite their contributions, they were prohibited from participating in the political affairs of Athens and held no rights in the legal system either. Metics were essentially resident foreigners, always aware of their liminal position within Athenian society.

Another group excluded from citizenship were women. In ancient Athens, women were considered to be an essential part of the private sphere, responsible for maintaining the household and raising children. While they played influential roles in the family unit, women had no legal or political standing. They were excluded from public life, unable to vote, hold office, or participate in the democratic processes that defined Athenian society. Instead, their existence revolved around the home, fulfilling societal expectations and perpetuating traditional gender roles.

Children born to non-Athenian parents also faced exclusion from citizenship. Even if one parent was an Athenian citizen, the child would still be denied citizenship unless both parents were Athenian. This policy aimed to preserve the purity and legitimacy of Athenian heritage, reinforcing the notion that citizenship was an inherited right rather than a merit-based status.

Lastly, we must not forget the significant population of slaves in ancient Athens. Slaves were considered property, deprived of basic rights and subjected to the will of their owners. They were not considered citizens, but rather possessions with no agency or legal protection. Slavery was deeply entrenched in Athenian society, with slaves serving in various capacities such as domestic help, agricultural laborers, or skilled workers. The institution of slavery was a deeply unjust aspect of Athenian society, further contributing to the marginalization of certain individuals.

In revealing the marginalized non-citizens of ancient Athens, we uncover a social hierarchy deeply rooted in exclusion and inequality. Foreigners, women, children of non-Athenian parents, and slaves were denied the fundamental rights and privileges associated with citizenship. Their voices were silenced, their agency suppressed, and their identities constrained by societal norms and legal frameworks.

It is important to acknowledge these historical realities and shed light on the lives of those who were systematically marginalized in ancient Athens. By embracing a holistic understanding of the Athenian society, we can recognize the flaws embedded within its democratic ideals and strive for more inclusive and equitable societies in our present day.

“In ancient Athens, citizenship was an exclusive privilege reserved for adult males born to Athenian parents. Foreigners, women, children of non-Athenian parents, and slaves were systematically excluded from citizenship, silenced, and denied fundamental rights and opportunities.”

In ancient Athens, the classification of citizenship was not as straightforward as it is today. Curious to know who were considered citizens in ancient Athens? Discover the fascinating criteria and distinctions that determined one’s citizenship in this illustrious city-state. Click here to unravel the mysteries of ancient Athenian citizenship: who were considered citizens in ancient athens.

What Does Democracy Mean in Ancient Athens?

YouTube video


In ancient Athens, democracy took on a different meaning than it does today. While elections are often seen as the cornerstone of democracy, the Athenians had a unique approach. Unlike the representative democracy we have today, Athens in the fifth century BC practiced direct democracy, where citizens had the opportunity to actively participate in the decision-making process. This article explores the principles and practices of Athenian democracy, shedding light on its significance and limitations.

Athenian Democracy: An Overview

Athenian democracy was built on the principle of “ho boulomenos” or “whoever wants to participate can.” This meant that any of Athens’ 30,000 legal citizens had the right to partake in the “ecclesia” or Citizens’ Congress, which convened multiple times a month. At these sessions, approximately 6,000 citizens had the right to speak, propose laws, or bring lawsuits. The aim was to encourage citizen participation and ensure that everyone had a voice.

The Role of Random Selection

While citizen participation was vital, a government with 6,000 people speaking simultaneously was not practical. To address this issue, Athens relied on a 500-member governing council called the Boule (Council of 500) to prioritize items on the agenda and evaluate proposals. Additionally, there were hundreds of juries and judges to handle legal matters. These officials were not elected or appointed, but chosen through random selection or drawing lots. This ensured that decision-making was not concentrated in the hands of a few, but spread across a broader spectrum of citizens.

“Unlike today’s representative democracy, Athens in the fifth century BC had a direct democracy, encouraging the participation of citizens from all classes thanks to the principle of ‘ho boulomenos,’ or ‘whoever wants to participate can.'”

The Evolution of Athenian Democracy

The establishment of Athenian democracy was a result of political and social tension. It emerged after a period of conflicts between nobles, which led to the extension of rights previously reserved for the elite to commoners. The Athenians considered participation in civic affairs a duty for all citizens, aiming to prevent the creation of ruling factions. By granting participation rights to a broader portion of society, Athens sought to create a more inclusive and equal system.

Limitations and Exclusions

However, Athenian democracy had significant limitations. Women, slaves, and foreigners did not enjoy full citizenship, and their political and legal rights were severely restricted. Athenian citizenship was only granted to adult males born to Athenian parents, highlighting the exclusivity of the system. Additionally, children born to non-Athenian parents were denied citizenship unless both parents were Athenian. Slaves, treated as property, had no rights or legal protection and were denied citizenship altogether.

“Women, slaves, and foreigners did not have full citizenship, and when filtering out those under the age of conscription, the pool of legal citizens was only about 10-20% of the Athenian population.”

Evaluation of Athenian Democracy

Athenian democracy attracted both praise and criticism. While some ancient philosophers, like Plato, criticized it as chaotic and uninformed, the positive connotations associated with the term have led to its use by various political regimes throughout history. The notion of the “wisdom of the crowd” has been questioned, prompting modern democracies to incorporate elections to select qualified representatives. However, this approach also brings challenges, such as the influence of wealth and the emergence of professional politicians whose interests may differ from those they represent.

Modern Implications

Although the Athenian system had its flaws, some democratic principles are still in practice today. While winning a position in the national government may seem like a lofty aspiration, citizens in certain regions have the opportunity to participate in juries, people’s panels, and referendum surveys. The use of random selection in such instances reflects the enduring influence of Athenian democracy.

“That’s how the democratic principles behind after elections by lot still exists today.”


Understanding what democracy truly meant in ancient Athens helps us appreciate the principles and challenges of democratic governance. Athenian democracy fostered citizen participation through direct decision-making, challenging the conventional belief that elections are the ultimate expression of democracy. Although Athenian democracy excluded various groups from full citizenship, its ideals continue to inspire and shape modern democratic practices. By examining the strengths and weaknesses of this ancient system, we can strive for more inclusive and equitable democratic societies today.


Question 1: Who were considered citizens in ancient Athens?

Answer 1: In ancient Athens, citizenship was primarily granted to free adult males who were born to citizen parents. These individuals, known as “citizens by birth” or “autochthons,” enjoyed full rights and privileges, including the right to vote and participate in the political life of the city-state.

Question 2: Were women considered citizens in ancient Athens?

Answer 2: No, women were not considered citizens in ancient Athens. They were excluded from political participation and did not possess the same rights and privileges as male citizens. Women were expected to focus on their roles as wives and mothers, and their primary responsibility was to maintain the household.

Question 3: Did slaves have any citizenship rights in ancient Athens?

Answer 3: Slaves, who were considered property rather than individuals, did not possess any citizenship rights in ancient Athens. They were owned by individual households or the state and were subject to the complete authority of their owners. Slaves had no say in political matters and were unable to participate in the democratic process.

Question 4: Were foreigners or non-Athenians able to attain citizenship?

Answer 4: It was extremely difficult for foreigners or non-Athenians to attain citizenship in ancient Athens. Although some exceptional individuals were granted citizenship for their contributions to the state, the majority of foreigners remained ineligible for citizenship. They were considered “metics,” a distinct legal and social class that held certain rights and responsibilities but lacked the full privileges of citizenship.

Question 5: Were there any other marginalized groups who were denied citizenship in ancient Athens?

Answer 5: Yes, there were other marginalized groups who were denied citizenship in ancient Athens. This included individuals born to foreign mothers and citizen fathers, known as “metics by birth,” as well as children born out of wedlock. These individuals were excluded from citizenship due to their parentage and were thus unable to enjoy the rights and privileges afforded to full citizens.